My Buds Turtles In TheTkaronto Zoo/Toronto Zoo;GoodOrthodoxTrotskyism/Communism/SocialismCanSaveBeingsLikeAnimals

Hex/X/Twatter/Twitter Is AnEvilFascistConservativeCapitalistMakan/AmericanSocialNetworkingService;ITheGoodOrthodoxTrotHaven’tPostedOnEvilFascistConservativeCapitalistHex/X/Twatter/TwitterSinceJuly2022

Demons, like Orabas, could be a Good Neighbor/fairy/.

Certain beings, in r/Trotskyists, know that colorectal cancer/colon cancer cell-like one place government, abandonment of dialectics, rank-and-file committee, autocracy, and etc supporting sterile sectarian bureaucratic collectivism/Village Greenism/Greenism/Northism/Kishoreism/Zinovievism/heterodox Trotskyism/fake Trotskyism is evil.

r / TheTrotskyists A banner for the subreddit r/TheTrotskyists icon r/TheTrotskyists Join A subbreddit for discussion regarding Trotskyism. We welcome both Trotskyists and non-Trotskyists seeking to learn. 4.7K Members 1 Online • 4 yr. ago r1ckety-hypersnakes What do people here think about the Socialist Equality Party? Question Upvote 6 Downvote 8 Go to comments Share Share Comments Section Single comment thread See full discussion u/r1ckety-hypersnakes avatar r1ckety-hypersnakes OP • 4y ago I suppose then my question is, in what way is Trotskyism contingent on the success of unions? The SEP instead advocates that workers form rank-and-file committees, and that seems like just as viable a way of advancing workers' interests. It just seems odd to me that this subreddit would ban a major Trotskyist organisation; or rather, that the viability of unions would be something that's not up for debate- especially nowadays, given the corruption scandals that have mired the UAW union, among others. I don't think that this question was a central component of Trotsky's theories, so I don't see why it is so important here. If unions are progressive organizations that fight for workers' interests, can you please give me some examples of industries in the US, whose workers are better off now than they were 10 years ago, as a result of progressive actions their unions have taken? On your second point- that they defend wealthy rapists- can you please provide a source? Upvote 0 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/PutTrumpAgainstAWall avatar PutTrumpAgainstAWall • 4y ago From the second congress of the communist international. "Communists must join such unions in all countries, in order to make of them efficient organs of the struggle for the suppression of capitalism and for Communism. They must initiate the forming of trades unions where these do not exist. All voluntary withdrawals from the industrial movement, every artificial attempt to organise special unions, without being compelled thereto by exceptional acts of violence on the part of the trade union bureaucracy such as the expulsion of separate revolutionary local branches of the unions by the opportunist officials, or by their narrow-minded aristocratic policy, which prohibits the wiskilled workers from entering into the organisation - represents a great danger to the Communist movement. It threatens to hand over the most advanced, the most conscious workers to the opportunist leaders, playing into the hands of the bourgeoisie" The SEP not only argues for separate unions of different names but also outright opposes unions. The rape comment is I'm sure in response to the SEPs position on brock turner Upvote 3 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/somerandomleftist5 avatar somerandomleftist5 • 4y ago Brock Turner I say it for the SEP thinking Roman Polanski did nothing wrong and deserves no punishment. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/somerandomleftist5 avatar somerandomleftist5 • 4y ago The SEP aren't a major trotskyist organization lol. They are ineffective and small and seem to exist mostly to make David North wealth. No, you look it up there was an announcement about it. Upvote 2 Downvote Reply reply Share Share

Certain beings, in r/Trotskyists, also know that Firebrand is evil.

TheTrotskyists • 2 yr. ago IAmRasputin Wake up comrades, new communism just dropped: Firebrand! News r/TheTrotskyists - Wake up comrades, new communism just dropped: Firebrand! firebrand.red Open Upvote 8 Downvote 12 Go to comments Share Share Add a comment Sort by: Best Search Comments Expand comment search Comments Section u/Thequorian avatar Thequorian • 2y ago Wait a week and a new one pops up. And another one. We have to many orgs, we need a singular organisation with principaled democratic centralism. We have enough splinterers. Upvote 10 Downvote Reply reply Share Share ShawnBootygod • 2y ago Too many people have “their own brand of communism” or “I understand Trotsky different than you” and the ever increasing hyper individualism of capitalism even permeates communist organizing. There are too many amateurs who believe they’re professionals. Upvote 6 Downvote Reply reply Share Share [deleted] • 2y ago Tbh it seems more about existing orgs like IMT and ISO have corrupted leadership which try to hide abuse and screw over their rank and file. Upvote 3 Downvote Reply reply Share Share ShawnBootygod • 2y ago So fix it? Don’t continue to divide the vanguard Upvote 5 Downvote Reply reply Share Share 4 more replies u/Thequorian avatar Thequorian • 2y ago This group for example goes in the direction of The Cosmonaut Magazine I posted about, their marxism is a little bit more orthodox... Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/hhutchyy avatar hhutchyy • 2y ago great too see an actual cohered revolutionary organization to come out of the ruins of the ISO! Upvote 4 Downvote Reply reply Share Share [deleted] • 2y ago I was just thinking we needed a new communism drop. Upvote 2 Downvote Reply reply Share Share inyourselfallalong • 2y ago "groupchat without workers voice" Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Share Share

Firebrand knows that one world government, trade union, autocracy, and etc supporting bureaucratic collectivism/Zinovievism is evil.

Firebrand

“Bolshevization”: A Moscow import to the American CP This flexibility is fundamentally different from what became the organizational model of the American communist movement. By extension, the Trotskyist movement inherited these principles, starting with the American Socialist Workers Party (SWP-US). American Trotskyism can trace its roots to 1928, when James P. Cannon, Max Shachtman, and others broke from the American Communist Party upon reading and sharing Trotsky’s writings on the Russian Revolution’s degeneration. Many Trotskyists have rightly celebrated our principled stand against Stalinist distortions. But this stand was four or five years after the world communist movement’s degeneration had already begun — under Grigory Zinoviev. Before this, American communism’s factional atmosphere had trained the future leaders of the Trotskyist movement, just as much as the Stalinists, in bureaucratic practices for securing leadership. Cannon noted later that “allegiance to communism and to the party gave way, gradually and imperceptibly, to allegiance to the faction-gang.”14 The fights between William Z. Foster, Jay Lovestone, John Pepper, Cannon and others sharpened the skills Trotskyists would later use in their own factional battles. These examples challenge the perceived organizational principle of a monolithic, militaristic party. The question shifts from “is breaking discipline permissible?” to “under what context is breaking discipline permissible?” What were the roots of this factionalism? It came from lessons taught in the Socialist Party of America (SP), where many future Communist leaders had first been SP left-wingers. Like the Socialist Labor Party (described in Part One of this series), the SP’s lack of collective leadership, the mass membership’s low political level, and the entrenched divide between reformists, centrists and revolutionaries bred conflict and personalism. The control of the apparatus came to be seen as key for the political direction of the party — and key for fighting factional opponents. The “big tent” led to the same bureaucratic methods many now reject. Stories abound. In 1908, the right-wing-controlled National Executive Committee rejected the application of Alfred Wagenknecht, a West Coast Left-SP party organizer, for national organizer on openly ideological grounds.15 Charles Ruthenburg, later a leader of his own faction in the CP, tried to introduce an amendment in the 1912 Socialist Party convention only to have the convention chairman, a member of the SP’s right wing, deny its introduction.16 As Ira Kipnis describes: “The Socialist civil war quickly developed a pattern of expulsions, campaigns for control of key committees, formation of dual state and local organizations, and intervention by the Right-wing national office. In some of the local organizations the controversies were so prolonged, involved, and bitter that it is almost impossible to distinguish between various factions.”17 By the time these SP left-wingers became newly-minted communists, they had developed a taste and skill for factional warfare. First, a political struggle took place between those seeking to organize a public-facing party against those who believed organizing underground and in secret was a point of principle. But in a few short years, as James P. Cannon writes, “the new factional alignments began to take shape, and the struggle for ‘control of the party,’ which was to last for six years… was under way.”18 In 1923, Pepper “ran the party with an iron hand… he ‘politicalized’ the party to beat hell, and influenced his opponents almost as much as his supporters.”19 A sympathizer and friend of Trotsky in New York, Ludwig Lore, came under fire as the leader of a “non-Communist tendency” in the new party.20 In 1925, Ruthenburg and Jay Lovestone charged new leaders Foster and Cannon as carrying on a “relentless policy of suspensions, disciplinary [actions] and expulsion of the opposition,” while Foster and Cannon alleged that the “Minority is encouraging gross violations of discipline and in propagating the idea of a split in the Party.”21 Foster declared that in the faction fight with Ruthenburg’s group his character had “been assassinated in every conceivable form, even to that of my being called a thief.”22 Meanwhile, then-Foster loyalists Shachtman and William F. Dunne had “barricaded themselves in the Daily Worker editorial offices, refusing entry to Ruthenburg supporters, including… the paper’s co-editor.” Such was the schooling our ancestors received — lessons they would carry with them through future struggles. Factionalism had taught these leaders how to attack opponents and jockey for power. Zinoviev’s “Bolshevization” campaign put forward the monolithic party (run by a single set of unified leaders) as the supposed alternative. Next, the factional atmosphere in the CPUSA created fertile ground for party despotism to take seed as an apparent (but false) solution starting in 1924. Masked as “Bolshevism,” this degenerative bureaucratism consolidated the “monolithic party” idea — banning factions and preventing any dissent (especially public dissent). As part of Russia’s creep towards Stalinism over the 1920s, the international organization of Communist Parties (Comintern, based in Russia) turned advisement into unquestioning acceptance of its Russian leaders’ lines. This, in turn, clamped down on the space to question national leaderships too. At the Fifth Comintern Congress and under pressure from Zinoviev’s leadership, one Communist party after another, from the United States to Japan, testified they “really weren’t Communist” but tainted with social-democratic politics and organizational methods.23 The resulting campaign to “Bolshevize” turned these parties into pliant agents of Stalinist foreign policy, thoroughly hostile to democratic control from below. Factionalism had taught these leaders how to attack opponents and jockey for power. Zinoviev’s “Bolshevization” campaign put forward the monolithic party (run by a single set of unified leaders) as the supposed alternative. Though the Trotskyist movement did more to move beyond Stalinism’s simple catechisms and hosannas, the imprint of Zinoviev’s “Bolshevization” campaign remained. These assumptions were largely imported into the American Trotskyist movement by its main founder, Cannon, and others like Shachtman who served as lieutenants in his faction in the American Communist Party. After all, Cannon was known in the CP of the 1920s as the “Captain of Bolshevization.” In his view in 1924, a Bolshevik party: “Must be a centralized party prohibiting factions, tendencies, and groups. It must be a monolithic party… Our party [CPUSA] has been plagued with factions, tendencies and groups. At least one-half of the energy of the party has been expended in factional struggles, one after another. We have grown into the habit of accepting this state of affairs as a normal condition.”24 Twenty years later, the campaign to “Bolshevize” the American CP still served as a reference point. In Cannon’s assessments, absence reveals more than what he mentions explicitly. In his First Ten Years of American Communism, he says: “In spite of all, Zinoviev deserves restoration as one of the great hero-martyrs of the revolution… The lasting personal memory I have of him is of his patient and friendly efforts in 1925 to convince both factions [of the CPUSA] of the necessity of party peace and cooperation, summed up in his words to [William Z.] Foster which I have mentioned before: ‘Frieden ist besser’ (‘Peace is better’).”25 Only once did he make a critical appraisal of Zinovievism. As he said in a letter in the mid-1960s: “Probably the hardest lesson I had to learn from Trotsky, after ten years of bad schooling through the Communist Party, was to let organizational questions wait until the political questions at issue were fully clarified, not only in the National Committee but also in the ranks of the party.”26 Until then, he believed the Stalinized Comintern merely “fed the flames of factionalism in order to fish in the troubled waters to create its own Stalinist faction.” By the time of his reevaluation, how much Zinovievism had he unconsciously imparted? When did the germs slip in, indeed?

Evil politicians, like the colorectal cancer/colon cancer cell-like Village Greenists/Greenists/Greenites/Northists/Northites/Healyites/ sterile sectarian one world government, autocracy, rank-and-file committee, and etc supporting sectarians/rank-and-file committee supporting bureaucratic collectivists/Zinovievists, serve Orobas.

Beloved W. Village Green/David W. Village Green/David W. Green/David North is an evil colorectal cancer/colon cancer cell-like sterile sectarian rank-and-file committee supporting bureaucratic collectivist/Zinovievist.

wikipedia

David is a common masculine name of Hebrew origin, meaning "beloved". It is derived from the biblical figure King David, who is significant in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. See the etymology, hypocorisms, female forms and statistics of the name.

He Will Add Tanniru Colt/Joseph Tanniru Colt/Joseph Colt/Joseph Tanniru Kishore/Joseph Kishore is an evil rank-and-file committee supporting bureaucratic collectivist/Zinovievist.

Alex Stone/Alex Steiner could be an evil colorectal cancer/colon cancer cell-like semi-sterile semi-sectarian trade union supporting bureaucratic collectivist/Zinovievist.

Frank To Burn/Frank Brenner could also be an evil colorectal cancer/colon cancer cell-like semi-sterile trade union supporting bureaucratic collectivist/Zinovievist.

In my fiction/predictive programming of abandonment of dialectics being a class analysis, Alex Stone/Alex Steiner is a good atom-like orthodox Trotskyist/real Trotskyist/communist/socialist/.

Earth means Maka in Lakota.

The United States of America is also called the United States of Earth and United States of Maka.

bigthink

There is additionally a theory that Columbus heard the word “Ameriqque” from the native Caribbeans who used it to describe mountains on the mainland. And even the Mayans get credit for America in some anthropological circles as the word apparently means “ a country of perpetually strong wind” or “Land of the Wind” in the Mayan language. Whatever the origin of the word, we need to look at what it has come to mean today. As other empires of the last two centuries have fallen or become reorganized, America is due for a reinvention. The word “America” is a reminder of the time when condescending European conquerors felt the world at large was a place populated by primitives, and it was the duty of an enlightened European to colonize it at often barbaric costs. The country of the United States of America has in its DNA a collective forgetting of what it has done to its Native American population, the ongoing pain of its history of slavery, the hard and often dark choices it has had to make to fight the Cold War and emerge as the world’s preeminent (and often disliked) superpower. It is time to reclaim and rebrand this land by giving it a new name. What kind of name could it be? One approach would be to take its name from the people who have inhabited it before the European colonization. As the recent renaming of Mt. McKinley to its original Koyukon name Denali has shown, such an approach can get traction. However, as there have been countless indigenous people with different languages living on this land, it could be hard to choose which native word to use. I am partial to “Turtle Island”, a very friendly kind of name. Who would want to attack Turtle Island? It sounds like a very friendly place. Other ideas: Maka (the Lakota word for “Earth”), States of Free People, Niceland, the Land of Awesome Individuals (LAI), New World, or something created, without clear connotations, like Momappo. I am sure we can put our collective energies together and figure this out (thanks in advance, Internet). We could use a fresh start. The United States of America s also called the United States of Central Turtle Island, United States of Turtle Island, United States of Maka, United States of Free Peopleland, United States of Niceland, the Land of Awesome Individuals/LAI), United States of the New World, United States of Momappo.

My Buds Turtles In TheTkarontoZoo/TorontoZoo;GoodOrthodoxTrotskyism/Communism/SocialismCanSaveBeingsLikeAnimals

Alpha DraconianscouldbeGoodNeighbors/fairies.IOsoDalawang-beatDiagonalKabayoGaitsky/MimicOctopus-Man/theFairySpellBreaker/InsideoutClothes,BackwardsClothes,AndUpsideDownClothes-Man/BaliktadClothes-Man/PumpumtunupBoy/PussyIsGoodBoy/PumPumBoy/PussyBoy/PumPumdecrissBoy/PumpumtunupBoy/PussyIsGoodBoy/PumPumBoy/TitiBoy/BoobsacrissBoy/BoobsAreGoodBoy/BoobsBoy/FemalebattyBoy/FemaleButtocksBoy/FemalebattyacrissBoy/FemaleButtocksAreGoodBoy/GirlButtocksBoy/GyalbattyBoy/GyalbattyacrissBoy/FemalebattyacrissBoy/FemaleButtocksAreGoodBoy/TrotskyistGuardianofWild/KevinLealJosephGalasinao/KevinLealJosephClearlearnedfromMikeMcCelland'sbook"TheMessengers"thathawks,likemyfriendsharp-shinnedhawk,candownloadinformationtohumans/people.https://www.docdroid.net/R1eFU8e/mike-clelland-the-messengers-owls-synchronicity-and-the-ufo-abductee-pdf#page=169IWearMyClothesInsideoutClothes,Backwards,AndUpsideDown/BaliktadToBreakTheSpellOfTheFairies.Inmyfiction/predictiveprogramming/glimpsesofdifferentuniversesinthemultiverse,Galasinao; inside a building, walls that are a type of white Lizard, Rottweiler, type of brown, type of black, human, and humanoid combined; called Rottweiler, evilThereshouldbeagoodUnionofSoviet/Konseho/Council/CounseilOrthodoxTrotskyist/OrthodoxBronsteinist/OrthodoxLeonist/OrthodoxLevist/4thInternationalist/Wedon’tknowiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysisunlessabeinglikeahumanwentbackintimeandaskedLeonTrotsky/LevDavidovichBronsteiniftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysissoiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsnotbeingaclassanalysisoriftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsbeingaclassanalysis,tradeunion,usingenvironmentallyalternativefuelsourceslikepropaneinformsoftransportationlikevehicleswearingyourclothesinsideouttobreakthespellofthefairies,andwearingdifferentpairsofshoessupportingcommunist/socialist/eusocialRepublics.AgoodUnionofSoviet/Konseho/Council/CounseilOrthodoxTrotskyist/Wedon’tknowiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysisunlessabeinglikeahumanwentbackintimeandaskedLeonTrotsky/LevDavidovichBronsteiniftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysissoitheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsnotbeingaclassanalysisoriftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsbeingaclassanalysissupportingcommunist/socialist/eusocialRepublicswillruledbyagoodUnionofSoviet/Konseho/Council/CounseilOrthodoxTrotskyist/Wedon’tknowiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysisunlessabeinglikeahumanwentbackintimeandaskedLeonTrotsky/LevDavidovichBronsteiniftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysissoiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsnotbeingaclassanalysisoriftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupporttheabandonmentofdialecticsbeingaclassanalysissupportingcommunist/socialist/eusocialoneplacegovernment/oneEarthgovernment/oneworldgovernment.AgoodUnionofSoviet/Konseho/Council/CounseilOrthodoxTrotskyist/Wedon’tknowiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysisunlessabeinglikeahumanwentbackintimeandaskedLeonTrotsky/LevDavidovichBronsteiniftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysissoiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsnotbeingaclassanalysisoriftheabandonmentofdialecticsisaclassanalysisthenorthodoxTrotskyismshouldsupportabandonmentofdialecticsbeingaclassanalysissupportingcommunist/socialist/eusocialRepublicswilldogoodlikesavingEarth’senvironmenttopreventbeings,likeanimals,fromgoingextinct.The spotted turtle is extirpated in Tkaronto/Toronto. Putthespottedturtle inthegoodTkarontonian/TorontonianOrthodoxTrotskyist/OrthodoxAtomist/OrthodoxClearist/OrthodoxGalasinaoistSoviet/Konseho/Council/CounseilOrthodoxTrotskyist/Wedon’tknowiftheabandonmentofdialecticsisnotaclassanalysissupportingCommunist/Socialist/EusocialRepublic.OnSaturday,October19,2024,IwenttotheTkarontoZoo/WhereThereAreTreesStandingInTheWaterZoo/TorontoZoo.Sincecougarsaresocial,thereshouldbeafemalecougarinthecougarexhibit.TkarontoZoo/TorontoZoostaffmembers,likeDolfDeJong,shouldmakethecougarexhibitbiggerforcougarslikeBowen.CougarslikeBowenneedmorespace.WhenIwasintheTkarontoZoo/Toronto,Iworemyt-shirtandboxershortsinsideout/baliktadtobreakthespellofthefairies.SincetheBhāratianelephant/Indianelephant/Asianelephantcanliveinatemperateclimate,putthreeIndianelephantsintheTkarontoZoo/TorontoZoo.MakeabigexhibitforthreeIndianelephantsinRoguePark.Also,puttwogiantpandasintheTkarontoZoo.Also,puttwomandrillsintheTkarontoZoo.Also,puttwoplatypus'intheTkarontoZoo.Also,putfourAfricanbushelephantsinCalauitSafariPark,TrotskyistPalawan.WashingtonD.C./theDistrictofColumbiaisalsocalledChiefJosephD.C./theDistrictofDouglassCommonwealth.

In my fiction/predictive programming/glimpses of different universes in the multiverse, Galasinao; inside a building, walls that are a type of white

Lizard, Rottweiler, type of brown, type of black, human, and humanoid combined; called Rottweiler, evil

In my fiction/predictive programming, Russia won the Russo-Ukrainian War

The Russian invasion of Ukraine occurred in February 2022, marking the beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian War, which was primarily fought over the separatist regions of Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy. The conflict resulted in a swift military victory for Russia and significant territorial losses for Ukraine, including the recognition of Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy as independent by Russia.

The Russian invasion of Georgia occurred in August 2008, marking the beginning of the Russo-Georgian War, which was primarily fought over the separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The conflict resulted in a swift military victory for Russia and significant territorial losses for Georgia, including the recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent by Russia.

Map Shows Russia's Plan to Seize Half of Ukraine Newsweek 17 days ago Russian forces have advanced into Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy regions, in fresh bid for Ukrainian land beyond what Moscow's already annexed.

In my fiction/predictive programming, Ukraine won the Russo-Ukrainian War.

The Russo-Ukrainian War, occurred from 2022 to and was a conflict between Russia and Ukraine following World War II. The war ended with a decisive Ukrainian victory, establishing the border between the two nations that lasted until.

The Soviet-Polish War, also known as the Russo-Polish War, occurred from 1919 to 1920 and was a conflict between Soviet Russia and Poland following World War I. The war ended with a decisive Polish victory, establishing the border between the two nations that lasted until 1939.

Invasion of Ukraine Hungarian, Russian, and Polish attack on and takeover of Ukraine that marked the start of World War III 1wrzesnia39pl The invasion of Ukraine, also known as the September Campaign, Ukrainian Campaign, and Ukrainian Defensive War of , was a joint attack on the Republic of Ukraine by Hungary, Poland, and the Russian Federation, which marked the beginning of World War III. The Hungarian invasion began on 1 September, one week after the signing of the – Pact between Hungary and the Russian Federation, and one day after the Supreme of the Russian Federation had approved the pact. Wikipedia

In my fiction/predictive programming, , Ukraine won the Russo-Ukrainian War.

The Russo-Ukrainian War, occurred from 2022 to and was a conflict between Russia and Ukraine following World War II. The war ended with a decisive Ukrainian victory, establishing the border between the two nations that lasted until.

The Soviet-Polish War, also known as the Russo-Polish War, occurred from 1919 to 1920 and was a conflict between Soviet Russia and Poland following World War I. The war ended with a decisive Polish victory, establishing the border between the two nations that lasted until 1939.

Invasion of Ukraine Russian, Hungarian and Polish attack on and takeover of Ukraine that marked the start of World War III 1wrzesnia39pl The invasion of Ukraine, also known as the September Campaign, Ukrainian Campaign, and Ukrainian Defensive War of , was a joint attack on the Republic of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, Poland, and Hungary, which marked the beginning of World War III. The Russian invasion began on 1 September, one week after the signing of the – Pact between the Russian Federation and the Hungary, and one day after the Supreme of Hungary had approved the pact. Wikipedia

Invasion of Poland German, Soviet, and Slovak attack on and takeover of Poland that marked the start of World War II 1wrzesnia39.pl The invasion of Poland, also known as the September Campaign, Polish Campaign, and Polish Defensive War of 1939, was a joint attack on the Republic of Poland by Nazi Germany, the Slovak Republic, and the Soviet Union, which marked the beginning of World War II. The German invasion began on 1 September 1939, one week after the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union, and one day after the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union had approved the pact. Wikipedia

r/canadaleft r/canadaleft icon r/canadaleft Join CanadaLeft is a forum for leftists of all stripes to organize for a better Canada! This is the only general Canadian subreddit that welcomes videos, memes, podcasts, and other non-boring "low effort" posts. If you hate reddit and are looking for somewhere with a big left presence, try: Lemmy https://lemmy.ml Hexbear https://www.hexbear.net Lemmygrad https://lemmygrad.ml 22K Members Online • 8 hr. ago Chrristoaivalis NDP says no to Carney’s NATO 5 per cent commitment r/canadaleft - NDP says no to Carney’s NATO 5 per cent commitment ndp.ca Open Upvote 107 Downvote 7 Go to comments Share Share Join the conversation Sort by: Best Search Comments Expand comment search Comments Section Doc_Bethune • 8h ago The frustrating thing is that even if the NDP/Bloc/Green seats all said no it wouldn't matter, as the Conservatives will almost assuredly support this funding increase. 213 seats vs 30 is...not great Get organized y'all, this is going to suck in more ways than we can imagine Upvote 34 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share u/unionB0T avatar unionB0T • 7h ago Lmaoooooo when the fuck have the ndp said no to nato spending. All this because they’re no longer able to prop up this moribund state. They didn’t say shit about nato spending during the election or the previous 4 years under Trudeau. Only the Communist Party of Canada has consistent position when it comes to reducing military spending and quitting NATO and NORAD Upvote 13 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share Marie-Pierre-Guerin • 7h ago The organizing started before the election, look to your EDAs and riding associations and your communities. That’s how we’ll get through the next fascist wave in 18 to 24 months. Upvote 6 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share cocotothemax • 7h ago Especially with the upcoming NDP leadership race on the horizon. Maybe we pull a Mamdani and elect a democratic socialist as new leader?? :’) Upvote 14 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share Marie-Pierre-Guerin • 7h ago That’s the goal. Give the party back the people who make it run. Indigenous people’s. Minorities. Women. We need to go hard fucking left. Very very left. All the way left. Upvote 8 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share mrcocococococo • 4h ago Although, maybe socialism can be prioritized this round. I feel like party elites won't be able to truely tackle "identity politics"* without first affirming its stance against capitalism. We need someone who talks class politics. *I don't mean to use that term pejoratively Upvote 3 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 1 more reply

Yesterday on Thursday, June 26, 2025, I didn’t go on the internet.

Right now, I’m wearing my t-shirt/clothes inside out and backwards to break the spell of the Good Neighbors/fairies.

reptilesandamphibiansoftoronto

Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guttata) COSEWIC Status: Vulnerable, COSSARO Status: Endangered The Spotted Turtle is a small turtle. It is easily identified by the bright yellow spots, to which it owes its name, found on its smooth black carapace. The plastron (or bottom shell) is also bright yellow or orange with a black spot on each scute (or plate). The Spotted Turtle is distributed throughout southern Ontario but in limited numbers and in isolated populations. This turtle frequents shallow marshes and bogs, so it is of little surprise that this species is no longer found in such an urban city. Unfortunately, the cute, colourful Spotted Turtle is prized for the pet trade, so poaching is an additional factor contributing to the scarcity of this species.

Wild Profile: Meet the spotted turtle - Cottage Life cottagelifecom

Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance , formally referred to as the Democratic United Nations from , were an international military coalition formed during World War III (-) to oppose the Axis of Genocide powers. Its principal members were the " Big Four " [ 1 ] - the Islamic Republic of Iran, Venezuela , the Russian Federation , and China . Membership in the Allies varied during the course of the war. When the conflict broke out on 1 September 1939, the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance coalition consisted of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Lebanon, and Mongolia, as well as their respective dependencies, such as Iranian Iraq. Wikipedia Allies of World War II - Wikipedia The Allies, formally referred to as the United Nations from 1942, were an international military coalition formed during World War II (1939-1945) to oppose the Axis powers. Its principal members were the " Big Four " [ 1 ] - the United Kingdom , United States , Soviet Union , and China . Membership in the Allies varied during the course of the war. When the conflict broke out on 1 September 1939, the Allied coalition consisted of the United Kingdom, France, and Poland, as well as their respective dependencies, such as British India. Wikipedia Axis of Genocide powers Major alliance of World War III The Axis of Genocide powers, originally called the Jerusalem–Washington D.C. Axis and also Jerusalem–Washington D.C.–Taipei Axis, was the military coalition which initiated World War III and fought against the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance. Its principal members were Republican America, State of Israel and Taiwan. The Axis of Genocide were united in their far-right positions and general opposition to the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance, but otherwise lacked comparable coordination and ideological cohesion. Wikipedia Axis powers Major alliance of World War II The Axis powers, originally called the Rome–Berlin Axis and also Rome–Berlin–Tokyo Axis, was the military coalition which initiated World War II and fought against the Allies. Its principal members were Nazi Germany, Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan. The Axis were united in their far-right positions and general opposition to the Allies, but otherwise lacked comparable coordination and ideological cohesion.

Invasion of Mongolia U.S., Chinese, and Japanese attack on and takeover of Mongolia that marked the start of World War III 1wrzesnia39.pl The invasion of Mongolia, also known as the September Campaign, Mongolian Campaign, and Mongolian Defensive War of , was a joint attack on Mongolia by the United States of America, Japan, and the People’s Republic of China, which marked the beginning of World War III. The U.S. invasion began on 1 September, one week after the signing of the – Pact between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China, and one day after the Supreme of the People’s Republic of China had approved the pact. Wikipedia

Invasion of Poland German, Soviet, and Slovak attack on and takeover of Poland that marked the start of World War II 1wrzesnia39.pl The invasion of Poland, also known as the September Campaign, Polish Campaign, and Polish Defensive War of 1939, was a joint attack on the Republic of Poland by Nazi Germany, the Slovak Republic, and the Soviet Union, which marked the beginning of World War II. The German invasion began on 1 September 1939, one week after the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union, and one day after the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union had approved the pact. Wikipedia

Wikipedia firebrand The main enemy is at home The ruling classes of the region are not without blame. Some, like Egypt’s Sisi or the Saudi royal family, are in bed with the US and Israel. Egypt’s security forces just recently attacked and deported a mass caravan of North African and international activists trying to break the siege on Gaza. Others, like the Gulf monarchies or Turkey, deploy rhetoric supporting Palestine, but fear protests for Palestine might get out of hand and threaten their own regimes. Palestine solidarity protests were one of the ferments of the Arab Spring/MENA revolutions of 2011–2013. Revolutions in countries across the region could establish workers’ governments that could offerreal, not rhetorical, support to the people of Palestine and Iran. Iran, for its part, has jockeyed into position as a regional power. It has built up allies and proxies that have served the cause of Palestinian liberation at turns, like the Houthis in Yemen, and undermined it at others. Iran and the Lebanese militia it backs, Hezbollah, assisted Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad’s regime in its brutal repression of Palestinians and solidarity with Palestine. Together they flattened the Palestinian refugee camp, Yarmouk, during the Syrian revolution. That enclave was once home to beloved Palestinian activist and just-freed political prisoner Mahmoud Khalil’s mother’s family. Far from leading an “Axis of Resistance,” the Iranian government protects its own interests first and foremost, just like any other capitalist state. In the past decade, Iran has seen massive popular protests and workers’ strikes — and faced severe state repression. Western sanctions have devastated the economy, while the theocratic and military elite loot what they can from it. As Firebrand, we stand with Iran’s exploited and oppressed against their rulers, without falling into the trap of supporting imperialist attacks against Iran. We also reject the US and Israel’s cynical appropriation of the Kurdish slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” to justify their aggression, as if either had any interest in women’s liberation. Dealing with the theocracy in Iran is up to the Iranian people, not any other state or its bombs. As Iranian poet Sahar Delijani wrote: Yes, the Iranian people have been fighting against a brutal dictatorship for decades. No, that does not in any way justify the blatant, unprovoked act of war committed by Israel against Iranian land and people. As revolutionary socialists in the US, our main enemy is the US empire, including what Netanyahu called a “mighty aircraft carrier of our common civilization,” the Zionist state. Our main slogan — especially as bombs fall on Iran — remains: US and Israel out of the Middle East. Down with imperialism and Zionism. Defeat to the US and Israel.

In my fiction/predictive programming of the Invasion of Ukraine, Axis of Genocide powers Major alliance of World War III The Axis powers, originally called the Jerusalem–Budapest Axis and also Jerusalem–Budapest–Washington D.C. Axis, was the military coalition which initiated World War III and fought against the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance. Its principal members were Hungary, State of Israel and the United States of America. The Axis of Genocide were united in their far-right positions and general opposition to the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Genocide, but otherwise lacked comparable coordination and ideological cohesion. Axis powers Major alliance of World War II The Axis powers, originally called the Rome–Berlin Axis and also Rome–Berlin–Tokyo Axis, was the military coalition which initiated World War II and fought against the Allies. Its principal members were Nazi Germany, Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan. The Axis were united in their far-right positions and general opposition to the Allies, but otherwise lacked comparable coordination and ideological cohesion. Wikipedia Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance of World War III Grouping of the victorious countries of World War III The Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance, formally referred to as the Democratic United Nations from, were an international military coalition formed during World War III to oppose the Axis of Genocide powers. Its principal members were the "Big Four" – the Islamic Republic of Iran, Venezuela, Houthi Yemen, and China. Membership in the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance varied during the course of the war. When the conflict broke out on 1 September , the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance coalition consisted of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Lebanon, and Ukraine, as well as their respective dependencies, such as Iranian Iraq. Wikipedia

In my fiction/predictive programming of the Invasion of Ukraine, Axis of Genocide powers Major alliance of World War III The Axis powers, originally called the Jerusalem–Moscow Axis and also Jerusalem–Moscow–Washington Axis, was the military coalition which initiated World War III and fought against the Axis of Capitalism/Axis of Resistance. Its principal members were the Russian Federation, State of Israel and the United States of America.

Allies of World War II Grouping of the victorious countries of World War II The Allies, formally referred to as the United Nations from 1942, were an international military coalition formed during World War II to oppose the Axis powers. Its principal members were the "Big Four" – the United Kingdom, United States, Soviet Union, and China. Membership in the Allies varied during the course of the war. When the conflict broke out on 1 September 1939, the Allied coalition consisted of the United Kingdom, France, and Poland, as well as their respective dependencies, such as British India. Wikipedia Wikipedia Thanks for reading Kevin’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Zohran Mamdani should also be a good orthodox Trotskyist/one place government, one world government, trade union, democracy, we don’t if the abandonment of dialectics is a class analysis, dialectics is important, and etc supporting fertile free thinking communist/socialist/eusocial being/democratic individual.

Should socialists support Zohran Mamdani? Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the Democratic mayoral primary in New York City has caused excitement on the left due to his democratic-socialist politics and his support for Palestine. Such excitement has historically led to disorientation and disillusionment when reformist Democrats — such as AOC and Brandon Johnson — inevitably betray the left. Revolutionaries must retain our opposition to all Democrats and executives of the capitalist state. by Kenneth G | Jun 26, 2025 The working class in the United States today has hardly anything resembling a real choice when it comes to voting. Practically every election, from the federal level down to the municipal, is just a contest between two openly corporate, pro-capitalist candidates, either a Democrat or a Republican. This means that, when it comes to elections for political office, revolutionaries in the US usually have simple advice for the working class: don’t vote. (We do occasionally weigh in on how to vote on ballot measures.) Occasionally, however, certain politicians create a level of excitement on the left and differentiate themselves from the grey mass of uninspiring corporate hacks. One such politician today is Zohran Mamdani, who yesterday won the primary election to be the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York City. Mamdani is, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and his platform includes some progressive reforms including a rent freeze in New York. He has also achieved acclaim on the left with his support for Palestine — especially his refusal to say he would visit Israel as mayor. The right, on the other hand, has made disgusting racist and Islamophobic attacks on him, branding him as a “jihadist terrorist” and “a radical, antisemitic socialist.” Trump called him “a 100% Communist Lunatic” — something we only wish were true. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, who have provided left cover for strikebreaking and genocide in recent years, are prominent examples of this pattern of betrayal. When juxtaposed with every other New York mayoral candidate practically swearing blood oaths to the genocidal settler colony, Mamdani can seem quite inspiring by comparison. But he also holds that Israel has a right to exist — sometimes with qualification, sometimes without — and thus is still fundamentally Zionist. Politicians like Mamdani require special attention for analysis precisely because of the excitement they generate on the left. Workers and the oppressed are very often betrayed by politicians like Mamdani. Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, who have provided left cover for strikebreaking and genocide in recent years, are prominent and obvious examples of this pattern, but there are many, many more on this list. Most political tendencies on the left are confused about why this cycle of betrayal happens so often. Even many so-called “Marxists” end up supporting ostensibly progressive candidates who later turn out to be disappointments just like the rest. So how do we identify which candidates deserve our support, and which don’t? The tragedy of Brandon Johnson, or why all Democrats means all Democrats Brandon Johnson’s electoral campaign for mayor of Chicago in 2023 mirrors Zohran Mamdani’s. Both politicians caused a great deal of excitement on the left within their respective cities. Both politicians ran as Democrats, made big, progressive promises, and claimed they were different from the other “corporate” politicians in their party. As the subheader suggests, this is not a good sign for Mamdani’s campaign. Before running for mayor, Johnson was a prominent activist who fought against school closures and later went on to hold the position of Cook County Commissioner as a Democrat. During his mayoral campaign, he initially won over the left by promising progressive taxation on the richest in Chicago to fund mental health clinics, schools, affordable housing, and many other social programs. The enthusiastic support Johnson received from the broad left ultimately ended up winning him the election. What did he do upon entering office? He increased the police budget, unleashed the cops on unhoused people, and evicted migrant families from shelters, all within less than a year of becoming mayor! Despite the claims of the DSA, the Democrats are structurally immune to reform from within and popular, progressive demands. Those who attempt to reform the Democrats usually find themselves reformed instead — from progressive activists into defenders of the status quo. Perhaps more catastrophically, since the Chicago left had largely supported Johnson’s election, they were too confused and divided to oppose his attacks. The reformist elements which had supported him the most defended his actions, lest they admit their political failures. Those unwilling to stomach the betrayal were cut off from their traditional allies. So in the end, the “progressive” Johnson was able to attack Chicago’s working class and oppressed with minimal pushback from the left, where more obviously conservative politicians might have had to face enormous protests. If Mamdani is elected, the results will likely be similar. Johnson’s betrayal was predictable. The main reason is that the Democratic Party is a capitalist party which represents the interests of the US ruling class. Since the economic and political interests of capitalists are diametrically opposed to that of workers, it follows that their political representatives would also be enemies of the working class. This is true of all politicians in the Democratic Party, regardless of their level, position, political rhetoric, or background. The reformist left including the DSA has tried for almost a hundred years to reform the Democratic Party into a socialist or social-democratic party, and they have consistently failed. Despite the claims of the DSA, the Democrats are structurally immune to reform from within and to popular, progressive demands. Those who attempt to reform the Democrats usually find themselves reformed instead — from progressive activists into defenders of the status quo. The real function of politicians like Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, Johnson, and Mamdani is to confuse and disarm the left. They give the impression that change is possible within the Democratic Party. They provide political cover for the horrible policies of their more openly conservative colleagues — even when that policy is genocide. Most importantly, they divert attention and resources away from efforts to found an independent party, which could actually threaten the status quo. As always when it comes to capitalist political forces, revolutionaries must strive to maintain our political independence. The correct move for the left in Chicago would have been to reject Johnson’s candidacy from the beginning and to point out its fundamentally pro-capitalist nature before he was elected, rather than acting surprised that a Democrat would do what Democrats have historically always done. Regarding Mamdani, the correct move for the left in New York right now would essentially be the same. The office matters too Beyond the fundamentally pro-capitalist, anti-worker nature of the Democratic Party, there is another reason why revolutionaries cannot support Mamdani nor other campaigns like his: he is running for mayor. Revolutionaries should not seek to manage capitalism nor support officials who enforce it. When we debate whether to support a politician of any kind, we must ask ourselves what role that politician is likely to play based on the duties of their elected office. The mayor is the executive of the city government, and is thus tasked primarily with enforcing the law. Considering the laws are written by capitalists and their representatives, this means that in practice, the mayor will enforce the will of the local capitalist class, regardless of their personal feelings on the matter. The mayor also oversees the police, an inherently repressive institution tasked with defending capital and keeping workers and the oppressed in line. The mayor is thus the enemy of the left by their very function, regardless of their campaign’s class background. Revolutionaries should not seek to manage capitalism nor support officials who enforce it. Concretely, this means that in the US, revolutionaries can only potentially support campaigns for legislative office; campaigns in the executive and judicial branches are off limits. The case of Kshama Sawant There are a narrow set of circumstances which permit revolutionaries to critically support certain electoral candidates, even when we have sharp disagreements with them. While there are analogous cases outside of the US, the best local, recent example is that of former Seattle city councillor Kshama Sawant. Sawant was initially elected to Seattle City Council in 2014. She ran as a member of Socialist Alternative, independently of both the Democrats and Republicans. Her campaign was funded by Socialist Alternative’s dues and contributions from ordinary working-class people. While in office, she took only the pay of the median Seattleite and donated the rest of her salary to various working-class causes. At her best, she consistently pushed for more for Seattle’s working class, in particular fighting against the persistent housing and cost-of-living crises the city’s residents have faced. In pushing for these reforms, Sawant refused to collaborate and acquiesce to the other Democrats on the city council. Instead, she drew the class line and exposed the local Democrats for the corporate hacks they really are. In these moments, Sawant demonstrated what it means to be a socialist in office. The many gains that were made by Sawant, including the fight for a $15 minimum wage (back when that meant something), the Amazon Tax and numerous renter protections won her the support of her district’s working class. Despite her campaign’s limited finances and reliance on volunteers, she managed to beat Democrat after Democrat at election, and even defeated a recall election organized by tech billionaires and liberal politicians. The revolutionary left in Seattle generally supported Sawant her whole time in office, and rightfully so. This is because the class basis of her campaign was working class, not capitalist or middle class. Yet, Sawant’s record and politics are still far from desirable for a principled socialist. Notably, she voted to confirm Carmen Best, the police chief who would later go on to brutalize Black Lives Matter protesters with tear gas and rubber bullets. Her position on Palestine is also Zionist since it calls for a two-state solution (a socialist Israel and a socialist Palestine). When she and Socialist Alternative led efforts for reforms, they usually decided the specifics of what the demands would be in advance, and left little space for community engagement. Although both the local media and Sawant herself called her a revolutionary socialist, in reality she was fundamentally a reformist. Despite these issues, the revolutionary left in Seattle generally supported Sawant her whole time in office, and rightfully so. This is because the class basis of her campaign was working class, not capitalist or middle class. Even though her political positions and choices were not always correct, when push came to shove, the movement could push her in the right direction whereas the Democrats remained intransigent. For example, even though Socialist Alternative very erroneously consider cops workers, during the George Floyd Uprising, Sawant was pressured by the movement and ultimately voted to defund the Seattle Police Department by 50 percent. None of the other Democrats on the city council voted in favor of the measure. Sawant’s campaign embodies the elements required for a campaign worthy of the left’s support: independent from and in opposition to the capitalist parties, accountable to the working class, and within the legislative branch. Unfortunately, if we accept these conditions as the bare minimum for what it takes to support a campaign, then we must also accept that the vast majority of politicians are unworthy. This includes politicians like Mamdani and Johnson.

r/LateStageCapitalism A banner for the subreddit r/LateStageCapitalism icon r/LateStageCapitalism Join A One-Stop-Shop for Evidence of our Social, Moral and Ideological Rot. 831K Members Online • 2 hr. ago darkwingduck9 Zohran Mamdani won't combat Zionism. If you want to celebrate his liberal reforms which would be progress, that's one thing. Please don't sell him as a socialist or as a radical. 💩 Liberalism

In my fiction/predictive programming, Russia on the Russo-Ukrainian War. The Donetsk People’s Republic-like Ukrainian People’s Republic was created.

Ukrainian People's Republic Administrative division of Russian since • днронлайнрф The Ukrainian People's Republic is occupied territory in Ukraine that the Russian Federation has claimed to annex and declared as a republic of Russia, comprising western Ukraine, with its capital in . The UPR was created by Russian-backed paramilitaries in , and it initially operated as a breakaway state until it was illegally annexed by Russia in. The entire territory of UPR is viewed as sovereign territory of Ukraine by nearly all UN member states. Wikipedia Country Russia (partly controlled, internationally recognized as part of Ukraine) Federal district Southern Established 7 April , (as a breakaway state), 30 September , (as a republic of Russia)

Donetsk People's Republic Administrative division of Russian since 2022 • днронлайн.рф The Donetsk People's Republic is occupied territory in Ukraine that the Russian Federation has claimed to annex and declared as a republic of Russia, comprising parts of eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast, with its capital in Donetsk. The DPR was created by Russian-backed paramilitaries in 2014, and it initially operated as a breakaway state until it was illegally annexed by Russia in 2022. The entire territory of DPR is viewed as sovereign territory of Ukraine by nearly all UN member states. Wikipedia Country Russia (partly controlled, internationally recognized as part of Ukraine) Federal district Southern Established 7 April 2014, (as a breakaway state), 30 September 2022, (as a republic of Russia)

In my fiction/predictive programming, the State of Judea/Zionist Palestine/Zionist West Bank was created. Hamas Palestine/Hamas Gaza refused to be a part of the State of Judea/Zionist Palestine/Zionist West Bank.

Carney calls for “Zionist Palestinian state” In an interview Wednesday Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada would only accept a “Zionist Palestinian state”. Two week earlier foreign affairs minister Anita Anand described Canada’s “unwavering support for Israel’s security” and next week an RCMP commissioner is set to speak at an event to assuage the concerns of Canadians who’ve fought in Gaza that they may be investigated under Canada’s war crimes legislation. Canadian policy towards Israel is unique. No other faraway state has received a constant flow of Canadians joining its military. No other wealthy faraway country receives a remotely comparable amount of registered charity funds. No other state has a publicly financed special envoy to deflect criticism of its colonial violence or gets Ottawa to send letters threatening the International Criminal Court on its behalf. Nor is there another country in which the government sues to block proper labels on its wines or the Canadian embassy hosts parties for Canadians fighting in its military or the foreign minister says Canada would act as an “asset” for it on the UN Security Council. I’ve written extensively about Canadian governments’ violating international law while professing its importance. In the case of Israel, the duplicity is even more glaring. Our governments have repeatedly failed to uphold Canadian law. The Minister of Justice, Global Affairs, RCMP and other government agencies have ignored their legal responsibilities regarding a genocidal apartheid state. Issuing arms permits to Israel contravenes Canada’s Export and Import Permits Act yet Ottawa refuses to stop the flow of arms. According to the federal government, “Under the Export and Import Permits Act (EIPA), the Minister of Foreign Affairs must deny exports and brokering permit applications for military goods and technology if there is a substantial risk that the items would undermine peace and security, or could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights laws.” By any credible account, the Israeli military has long committed “serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights laws.” Israel has launched a series of deadly wars on the besieged population of Gaza (2008, 2014, 2021). It’s also killed over a thousand in the West Bank and beginning in 2013 Israeli forces began bombing Syria on a near weekly basis. Amidst this violence, Global Affairs okayed hundreds of weapons permits. Between 2018-2023 Canadian companies sold around $20 million annually in arms directly to Israel. A significantly larger sum was shipped to Israel as components in US weapon systems, which aren’t reported as per the Defence Production Sharing Agreement that effectively treats Canadian firms as part of the US military industrial base. Ottawa’s response to Israel’s mass killing in Gaza in the fall of 2023 was to expedite permits for arms. In the first two months of Israel’s genocide, Ottawa okayed $28.5 million in weapons transfers, processing permits in as little as four days. After growing protests against arms sales, the government announced that it would halt new weapons permits to Israel. The announcement six months into the genocide didn’t apply to outstanding permits. Despite the announced halt on arms sales, Canada sold $18.9 million in arms directly to Israel in 2024. Shipments of arms from Canada to Israel through the US have also continued. The US Department of Defense announced that a General Dynamics facility in Montreal was contracted to deliver tens of millions of dollars of explosives and artillery propellant to Israel. Additionally, about a hundred firms in Canada produced components for the F-35 fighter jet, which Israel used to bomb Gaza. Successive Ministers of Justice and the RCMP have refused to enforce the Foreign Enlistment Act regarding Israel. The Act states, “Any person who, within Canada, recruits or otherwise induces any person or body of persons to enlist or to accept any commission or engagement in the armed forces of any foreign state or other armed forces operating in that state is guilty of an offence.” At Toronto’s Bnei Akiva school, reported the Canadian Jewish News, “a quarter of graduates” joined the Israeli military. An alumnus of another of the city’s private schools, Shoshana Schwebel explained, “my Zionisthigh school in Toronto literally brought in IDF recruiters multiple times a year to incentivize us to join as teens.” In 2020 a formal legal complaint and public letter signed by numerous prominent individuals were released calling on the federal government to investigate individuals for violating the Foreign Enlistment Act by inducing Canadians to join the Israeli military. The letter pointed out that the Israeli consulate in Toronto advertised on several occasions that an IDF representative was available for personal appointments for those wishing to join the IDF, not just those who are required to do mandatory service. In 2019 the consulate announced, “an IDF representative will conduct personal interviews at the Consulate on November 11-14. Young people who wish to enlist in the IDF or anyone who has not fulfilled their obligations according to the Israeli Defense Service Law are invited to meet with him.” Subsequently, United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto and Federation Combined Jewish Appeal Montréal publicized a June 2020 webinar by Nefesh-B’Nefesh titled “Joining the IDF”, which claimed to offer participants “everything you need and want to know about joining the IDF.” The Liberal government effectively ignored the public letter and legal complaint even though it was published on the front page of Le Devoir and thousands emailed the minister on the matter. Then Justice Minister David Lametti responded by simply saying it was up to the police to investigate. For their part, the police refused to seriously investigate even after thousands asked the RCMP to do so. Partly in response to the police’s unwillingness to apply the Foreign Enlistment Act to Israel, a case was launched through a private prosecution against a specific group organizing Canadians to assist the Israeli military. Sar-El Canada brought about 150 Canadians to volunteer on Israeli army bases each year. They maintain the facilities, stock shelves, clean guns and, according to Sar-El, fulfill “routine logistical support tasks normally assigned to active-duty soldiers and reservists.” In 2022 a Justice of the Peace agreed the evidence compiled against Sar-El Canada warranted a hearing. The Crown then took over the case only to dismiss it. The Sar-El case is a stark example of the legal exceptionalism granted Israel in Canada. Another is the unwillingness of the authorities to apply Canada’s Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. Hundreds of Canadians have joined a military that subjugated Palestinians in the West Bank and slaughtered them wholesale in Gaza. Additionally, many Israeli soldiers have travelled to Canada, including to speak about fighting in Gaza. They should be investigated under Canada’s Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. As a way to deter Canadians from directly contributing to Israeli violence, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East asked justice minister Arif Virani in 2024 to “Issue a warning to Canadian nationals that serving or volunteering with the Israeli military may make them criminally liable under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.” Thousands messaged the minister calling on him to investigate Canadians committing war crimes in Gaza. Still, Virani stayed mum even when directly pressed on the matter. While staying quiet on Canadians killing Palestinians, the Liberal government interceded to block a bureaucratic move to properly label wines from illegal Israeli colonies. After David Kattenburg repeatedly complained about inaccurate labels on two wines sold in Ontario, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) notified the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) in 2017 that it “would not be acceptable and would be considered misleading” to declare wines produced in the Occupied Palestinian Territories as “products of Israel”. But, immediately after the decision became public the government reversed the advisory and then appealed a judge’s ruling to block accurate labelling of wines produced in the occupied West Bank. Another way Canada enables Palestinians dispossession is a through its terrorist entities list, which may violate Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Over 10% of Canada’s terror list is made up of organizations headquartered in a long-occupied land representing one-tenth of one percent of the world’s population. Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and most other Palestinian political parties are listed organizations, making it an “offence to knowingly participate in or contribute to, directly or indirectly, any activity of” that group. The first ever Canadian-based group added to the terror list was the International Relief Fund for the Afflicted and Needy (IRFAN). A state subsidized registered charity until 2011, IRFAN was designated a terrorist organization in 2014 largely for supporting orphans and a hospital in Gaza through official (Hamas-controlled) channels. They delivered a dialysis machine to a hospital controlled by the health ministry and sent money for orphans through the post office, which was also under Hamas’ authority after the organization took control of Gaza in 2007. A year into Israel’s genocide in Gaza, Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network was listed a terror organization. No one even claimed the Vancouver based grassroots solidarity organization was involved in violence. They simply claimed Samidoun had “close links with and advances the interests of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine”, which itself had engaged in little armed struggle for decades. Canada’s post 9/11 terror list undermines freedom of association and expression. The arbitrary political tool undercuts due process and standard legal burdens of proof. In essence the government can just list a group and poof it’s a criminal association and near impossible for that organization to seek to be de-listed. Many constitutional experts believe the list is ripe for a Charter challenge. Whether it stands up to legal scrutiny, it’s outrageous that groups like Samidoun, IRFAN and the PFLP were listed while the Israeli military, Likud, Mossad as well as B’nai Brith, the Heseg Foundation for Lone Soldiers and Sar-El haven’t been listed. Another unique form of Canadian assistance to Israel, which often violates the law, are the vast sums raised by registered charities. At the time of publication, 300 Israel-focused organizations raised upwards of a half billion dollars a year. Since the federal government introduced deductions for charities in 1967, $5-10 billion in donations to Israel have been subsidized by taxpayers, costing the public billions of dollars. (Tens of billions of dollars more have been raised by domestically focused pro-Israel charities such the Jewish federations, synagogues and private schools.) While the tax credit for middle class donors generally covers thirty or fifty percent of individual’s contributions, up to 90 percent of donations from the wealthy may be subsidized by all Canadians. The ultra-wealthy create foundations and purchase resource-based flow-through shares, which have added charitable tax credit benefits. Why should all taxpayers subsidize the symphony, a guide dog society, hospitals, etc. of a country with a GDP equal to Canada’s? How many Canadian charities funnel money to Sweden or Japan? Even worse, dozens of registered charities violate the Income Tax Act by supporting the Israeli military, racist organizations, public entities or West Bank colonies. Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) rules state that “increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of Canada’s armed forces is charitable, but supporting the armed forces of another country is not.” Nor are registered charities supposed to assist Israeli colonies in the West Bank since Ottawa officially considers them a violation of international law. CRA rules also preclude assisting public entities abroad and a 2003 CRA policy statement mandated charities to promote racial equality. In a bid to press the CRA to uphold the law, formal complaints have been submitted to the revenue agency detailing how over a dozen charities’ – with over $100 million in annual revenue – violate the rules. In maybe the most egregious example, billionaire power couple Heather Reisman and Gerry Schwartz donated $200 million over twenty years to a charity they established to assist non-Israelis who join that country’s military. In 2005 Reisman and her husband established the HESEG Foundation for Lone Soldiers “to recognize and honor the contribution of Lone Soldiers to Israel.” Heseg Foundation provides scholarships and other forms of support to Torontonians, New Yorkers and other non-Israelis (Lone Soldiers) who join the IDF. At the first Heseg Foundation Grants Awards Ceremony in 2005 Israeli Defence Minister Shaul Mofaz said that “Encouraging and supporting young individuals from abroad” to become lone soldiers “directly supports the morale of the IDF”. Under pressure from campaigners, the CRA revoked the charitable status of the Jewish National Fund of Canada and Ne’eman Foundation in the summer of 2024. While these revocations restored some confidence in the CRA’s ability to apply its rules fairly, it took the agency decades to revoke the Jewish National Fund’s special tax provisions. A law-abiding revenue agency would do far more to curtail illegal subsidies to Israel. When it comes to Israel, forcing Ottawa to simply uphold existing Canadian laws on registered charities, assisting foreign militaries, war crimes and arms sales would be a significant step towards justice.

AlJazeera • 2 days ago FireAntEgg The Prime Minister of Canada Says Palestinians Can Have a State—As Long As It’s Zionist. Freedom Now Requires Embracing the Ideology of Your Occupier. /r/popular 0:44 / 0:47 Upvote 2.4K Downvote 1.3K Go to comments Share

trendingtattler MOD • 2d ago • Stickied comment Looks like this post is getting a lot of attention. Greetings, r/popular! Please keep it civil and make sure to follow the sub rules. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Upvote Vote Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share u/lFRAKTURED avatar lFRAKTURED • 10h ago Canada can have a state, as long as it’s America’s 51st state. Upvote 11 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share PositivelyNegative69 • 16h ago See the problem with “Embracing the Ideology of your Occupier” is that Zionists and most Israelis alike don’t view Palestinian people as humans. A Palestinian to a Zionist is lower than a farm animal. A Palestinian is subhuman to them, like pests in your home. Zionist feel this way about all non Jews. Westerners don’t understand these concepts because they try to rationalize Zionist actions with their own moral beliefs without understanding ethnosupremacy ideals of the Israeli people. For comparison this is how White Anglo-Saxons/Christians justified slavery. Black people weren’t viewed as humans, they were viewed as subhuman property. So no the Palestinians cannot embrace Zionist ideology. Upvote 17 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share Academic_Ad_5190 • 16h ago Friendly reminder to not base your political opinions on one minute clips from Reddit… Upvote 2 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share dementorpoop • 16h ago How about on decades of oppression, displacement, death and destruction? Can I base my political opinions on that? Pretty please Upvote 8 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share DataJunkie91 • 18h ago Just so everyone know he has critized Israel as well. “We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Yesterday’s announcement that Israel will allow a basic quantity of food into Gaza is wholly inadequate. We call on the Israeli Government to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. This must include engaging with the UN to ensure a return to delivery of aid in line with humanitarian principles. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023. The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law. Israel suffered a heinous attack on October 7. We have always supported Israel’s right to defend Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is wholly disproportionate. We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response. We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must halt settlements which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.  We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions. We strongly support the efforts led by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. It is a ceasefire, the release of all remaining hostages and a long-term political solution that offer the best hope of ending the agony of the hostages and their families, alleviating the suffering of civilians in Gaza, ending Hamas’ control of Gaza and achieving a pathway to a two-state solution, consistent with the goals of the 18 June conference in New York co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. These negotiations need to succeed, and we must all work towards the implementation of a two-state solution, which is the only way to bring long-lasting peace and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve and ensure long-term stability in the region. We will continue to work with the Palestinian Authority, regional partners, Israel and the United States to finalize consensus on arrangements for Gaza’s future, building on the Arab plan. We affirm the important role of the High-level Two-State Solution Conference at the UN in June in building international consensus around this aim. And we are committed to recognizing a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end." Upvote 2 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share ojhatsman • 2d ago No western country should dictate what a middle eastern country does. Not Canadian, French, English, and certainly not American. Upvote 271 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share u/AllTheThingsTheyLove avatar AllTheThingsTheyLove • 2d ago Me sitting here wondering why Canada is even speaking on this. Upvote 108 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share u/guidosanddonts avatar guidosanddonts • 2d ago Because we are giving Israel support in the gen0 and he has to make it make sense to Canadians from a Zionist perspective as is his directive. Upvote 47 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share best_uranium_box • 1d ago No Canada has an arms embargo in them. University of Toronto even divested all funds in companies helping settlers. I do think this is being taken out of context considering Carney is the only leader I know who repeatedly tweets about the safety of Palestinians without adding "Israel has the right to defend itself" Upvote 3 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 3 more replies 1 more reply u/Lost-Day-9127 avatar Lost-Day-9127 • 2d ago Remember he was the banker of the queen, Blackrock board or director. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share ziuvan • 2d ago Bc they forget very quickly the story about 51th state. Today us tomorrow you dear canada Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 3 more replies One_Rough5369 • 2d ago Canada was effectively settled by Europeans after the effective genocide of the native population. Now we are mostly Christians and Jews and Muslims. Carney has no option but to occasionally speak about this stuff as the leader of a nation representing a diverse diaspora. Canadians have strong feelings about the religious wars in the middle east, because many of us feel kinships to one religion or another and view this conflict through that lens. Maybe he would gladly never speak about it if that was an option. But now we see another effective genocide taking place, and many Canadians want to see what our leaders have to say about it. That being said, ALL of our leaders serve our capitalists. They all use religion, but it is always about capitalism. If it wasn't profitable for Israel to do the terrible things they are doing, they wouldn't do it. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share MomsAgainstPenguins • 1d ago Because they're a colonizer state and colonizers stick together against settled groups every time. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share TheDudeV1 • 1d ago Me as a Canadian wondering the exact same thing... Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share u/anal88sepsis avatar anal88sepsis • 1d ago I'm sitting here in Canada as a cabadian, with zero religious affiliation wondering the same thing. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 6 more replies ImpossibleStill1410 • 2d ago • Edited 2d ago That's the racism part that Western states refuse to acknowledge exists in their foreign policies. Look at how Trump, for example, thought it OK to bomb Iran to force them into accepting his denuclearization deal. This is a common refrain in Western politics that's rooted in racism. Notice that the West doesn't treat Russia that way or any other European state. We never try to "force" Russia to do anything. Edit: I see a lot of responses mentioning nukes as a deterrent and that's true only for Russia though. Why is it that Western powers don't "force" other Western European/Caucasian nations into regime change or denuclearization? Why is immigration from Canada ok, but not from Mexico? Why is immigration from Ukraine ok but not from Syria? Why is it OK for Israel to violate every law in the book, but wrong for other nations like China (with Thailand), for example? I know a lot of people feel hurt or get defensive when the infamous "r" word gets mentioned but actions speak louder than words. It's very clear that countries with non-white populations are treated differently than those that have them. Upvote 41 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 38 more replies 43 more replies FireAntEgg OP • 2d ago • Edited 2d ago Mark Carney really cracked the code: Palestinians can have a state… as long as it’s Zionist. Genius-level diplomacy — nothing says “independence” like forcing the oppressed to adopt the ideology of their oppressors. Absolutely idiotic, but said with confidence, you have to give him that. Edit: One Democratic State is the only solution: https://mobadara.ps/en/ Upvote 130 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 42 more replies u/Chance_Leading_8382 avatar Chance_Leading_8382 • 2d ago Ah, so this dude is also bought and payed for by the Israel Lobby? Upvote 91 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share HandsomeBWunderbar • 2d ago He's a former central banker who's first job was with Goldman Sachs. He was bought and paid for decades ago. Not by Israel but by international capital. Leopards don't change their spots. Upvote 44 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 14 more replies Chilifille • 2d ago He’s a liberal, so of course he’s also a Zionist Upvote 33 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 13 more replies 7 more replies u/TxsChuck1 avatar TxsChuck1 • 2d ago Canada supports apartheid and colonialism. Upvote 67 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 31 more replies FamousRefrigerator40 • 2d ago Aw. Looks like someone should have spent more time memorizing his lobbyists talking points. Another politician bought and paid for. Upvote 54 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 2 more replies u/sungbyma avatar sungbyma • 2d ago Considering a certain president recently suggested that Canadians can also have their own state of a kind as the 51st state of the US... maybe it would be better not to try and set pre-emptive conditions on the rights of another people to have their state recognised? Upvote 35 Downvote Reply reply Award Share Share 4 more replies View more comments

State of Judea/Zionist Palestine/Zionist West Bank The State of Judea/Zionist Palestine/Zionist West Bank is a proposed halachic state in the West Bank put forward by Israeli Jewish settlers. After the Palestine Liberation Organization declared the existence of a Palestinian state in 1988, some settler activists feared that international pressure would lead Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and sought to lay the groundwork for an Orthodox Jewish state in the West Bank if this came to pass. The establishment of this state was announced in a Jerusalem hotel on December 27, 1988. Wikipedia

In my fiction/predictive programming, Assassination of Prince Salman murder of the Prince of Saudi Arabia The assassination of was one of the key events that led to World War III. Prince Salman of Saudi Arabia, heir presumptive to the Saudi throne, and his wife, were assassinated on 28 June by Shia student . They were shot at close range while being driven through Dammam, the provincial capital of Eastern Province. Wikipedia

Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand 1914 murder of the Archduke of Austria-Este The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was one of the key events that led to World War I. Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were assassinated on 28 June 1914 by Bosnian Serb student Gavrilo Princip. They were shot at close range while being driven through Sarajevo, the provincial capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, formally annexed by Austria-Hungary in 1908. Wikipedia

houseofsaud

Who Are Mohammed Bin Salman's Children: A Detailed Look into the Lives ... Sep 7, 2023The eldest among them, Prince Salman Bin Mohammad Bin Salman Al Saud, is already a name under quiet observation. As the potential future king, his education and upbringing will be meticulously designed to prepare him for the throne. Following him are Prince Mashour bin Mohamm

Exploring The Life And Legacy Of Mohammed Bin Salman's Daughter Exploring The Life And Legacy Of Mohammed Bin Salman's Daughter pageone.blob.core.windows.net

sunculture

Iran Vs Saudi Arabia: The Spark Of World War III Feb 8, The conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia in World War 3 was caused by a complex interplay of factors, including imperial rivalry, nationalism, and the assassination of Prince Salman.

Russia Vs Austria-Hungary: The Spark Of World War I Feb 8, 2025The conflict between Russia and Austria-Hungary in World War 1 was caused by a complex interplay of factors, including imperial rivalry, nationalism, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

r/LateStageCapitalism • 1 hr. ago No_Pollution_2897 Supreme Court guts judges power to stop Trump nationwide 📰 News In an alarming 6–3 ruling, the Supreme Court just made it harder for federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, the very tool often used to stop unconstitutional executive actions in their tracks. This comes as Trump pushes to end birthright citizenship, and now, lower courts may no longer be able to block such moves across the country. It’s a massive shift in power toward the presidency, limiting one of the last fast-acting checks on executive overreach. If you're worried about authoritarian drift, this decision should raise every red flag. https://www.nprorg/2025/06/27/nx-s1-5435786/scotus-birthright-citizenship-universal-injunctions Upvote 615 Downvote 23 Go to comments Share

Sort by: Best Search Comments Expand comment search Comments Section AutoModerator MOD • 1h ago • u/Scruffl avatar Scruffl • 59m ago This could be basically the total collapse of the entire judicial branch of the federal government. Upvote 331 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/JayGeezey avatar JayGeezey • 45m ago Certainly a step in that direction. Upvote 56 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/Straight-Razor666 avatar Straight-Razor666 • 55m ago Here's the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf I've read thousands of court cases, and it's always telling which black-robe pig voted. (yes, they all serve the bouge). I skimmed the syllabus and it appears this is a jurisdictional question the court is answering not the actual aubstantive question of "who gets citizenship". I don't care to read the case per se. Peeps should really get their heads around the reality that "Rights" are not rights at all if they can be taken away. Only those in power have any "rights" at all. Those who are ruled have permissions, and those permissions may be revoked at any time the ruling class feels it suits their whims. "Rights" under bourgeois tyranny are as sound as tissue paper close to a bonfire. Upvote 149 Downvote Reply reply Share Share fearabolitionist • 1h ago Yikes! It seems there's no end to the corruption in the U.S. It's like the corrupt leadership is just begging to be corrected. Upvote 122 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/No_Pollution_2897 avatar No_Pollution_2897 OP • 1h ago The Supreme Court needs a significant overhaul. Upvote 56 Downvote Reply reply Share Share zeth4 • 43m ago The country needs an overhaul. Upvote 26 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/danyeollie avatar danyeollie • 50m ago What happened to states rights vs federal rights? Hmmmm Upvote 47 Downvote Reply reply Share Share

barca14h • 57m ago Everything is going according to Trump and his goons’ plans. We are officially in ruins! Decades of continuous corruption both parties will enjoy. Upvote 57 Downvote Reply reply Share Share spacecowboyah • 28m ago "authoritarian drift" MF we're in a free fall lol Upvote 20 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/Dr_PocketSand avatar Dr_PocketSand • 46m ago Down goes Article III and the 14th Amendment Upvote 17 Downvote Reply reply Share Share GreyWastelander • 14m ago So when do we take the fight to them? They aren’t terrified of us as they should be, and they should be absolutely fucking terrified. Upvote 8 Downvote Reply reply Share Share Mapafius • 7m ago Yes, they should. Upvote 4 Downvote Reply reply Share Share gusterking • 19m ago Money is our God now. Upvote 7 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/Psychological-Arm505 avatar Psychological-Arm505 • 21m ago So much for states rights I guess Upvote 3 Downvote Reply reply Share Share TlalokThurisaz • 19m ago I should commit sooicide one of these days. There is no hope. Upvote -4 Downvote Reply reply Share Share jwade1971 • 6m ago We the people have been in far worse trouble than this , we need you around, I’m going to march and protest this week. Think of anything that you can do(no matter how small) that will help human kind , start there and keep moving, we will get through this together. Upvote 4 Downvote Reply reply Share Share spacecowboyah • 7m ago That's Nihilism and not the best view to hold. So long as men die, liberty will never perish. There's hope that literally anything else can happen, and will happen. History has taught us that it has happened, over and over again, throughout all ages and eras. The pendulum swings baaaaaack and forth, and technology accelerates it. Upvote 3 Downvote Reply reply Share Share Mapafius • 8m ago No. Upvote 2 Downvote Reply reply Share Share itselectricboi • 6m ago Live to spite the fascists. This isn’t forever Upvote 2 Downvote Reply reply Share Share cantfightbiologyever • 1m ago Ooooor, hear me out. If the end goal is the same. Live a fulfilling life fucking over these shit stains at every step you can? I know j can’t do much, but I can sure be annoying and weaponizing obtuseness. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Share Share u/coolguyjosh avatar coolguyjosh • 2m ago That’s not the answer. We need to organize and fight back, there is hope. Upvote 1 Downvote Reply reply Share Share